"TOR" <temple_of_reason@yahoo.co.uk>
2005-06-13 17:50:19 UTC
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 04:03:44 GMT, "TOR"
***Where he states "Evans' "Atheism Lite," which seeks to negotiate a truce
between religious and irreligious world views, is easily demolished. " he
also states no foundation for such unsupported conjecture as he presents.
I thought he supported it well.between religious and irreligious world views, is easily demolished. " he
also states no foundation for such unsupported conjecture as he presents.
I prefered his article to your reply on every level.
Cheers, Mark
god they merely believe or don't believe, argue for or against.
Gandhi as a much more valid measure of sanity wrote "Truth is my God", and
so since you as an Atheist don't believe in what you call "god", do you are
automatically and dogmatically oppose what Gandhi called TRUTH? Yes, Gandhi
in nation building was a much better and more experienced judge than those
of cheap commercial literary design whither they were secular or evangelical
in design. As Gandhi struggled in a country of many diverse groups sometimes
rightly and sometimes wrongly he was a better judge.
If one says "Truth is my God.", one can ask "What is your god?", and then
conject by sarcastically adding "Is it lies?". Many months ago here I asked
what is the distinction between "the Big Bang" and "god" and was mostly was
attacked by brainless Rusdie like clones that were die stamped from the same
forges of neo-liberal rhetoric with a bogus label of atheist.
But what makes them atheists? Just because people claim to be Atheists does
that make them Atheists?
By merely opposing those who called themselves "Theists" and "Deists" does
not make them Atheists.
In the debate on god the arguments presented are not fair they are extremely
dogmatic and demagoguery,
If Atheists are correct in opposing what ever Theists and Deists say, by
saying themselves there is no basis to show god exists
is that correct? and can they then can't honestly turn around and then argue
against what they claim doesn't exist? No they can't so then they resort to
name calling and labeling the religious as entirely psychotic, insane,
delusional, child molesters, hypocrites, money grubbing, adulters when those
same "Atheists" don't believe to there anything wrong with what they attack
others for.
So what are they trying to accomplish?
So if "truth is god" should atheists be automaticly against it? If one
should not automaticly oppose what someone calls "god"
at what measure or demarcation should one stop in their attacks irrespective
of their senseless arguments of abstract agnostic existential subjective
contentions and conjecture without foundation basis relevance or
materiality?
Conversely at what point should Theists resist equal temptations to act
against others.
I do not believe in the supernatural, the mystical, the metaphysical or
anything outside of the realm of the materialist conception but also I
recognize that materialist existence as an extension of what people call
"god", nature", which has basis in creation one way or another:
So why must I and others suffer when so-called atheist and theist bastard
congregate to cause havoc in that they disturb the peace and lawful
expression by means of impassioned unholy alliances of adversely design that
knows no limit in any manner or form without honesty or truth?
Dave in this group is a perfect example case in pointed as he correctly
You have no idea what my "brand" of Secular Humanism is, so how
can you make such an absurd statement?
BECAUSE HIS WHOLE BASIS IS ATTACKING OTHERS (LIKE A COWARD) WITHOUT EVERcan you make such an absurd statement?
ACTUALLY REVEALING HIS OWN VIEWS THOUGH HE HAS BEEN TROLLING ME FOR MONTHS.
SO DOES THE FBI have his number (maybe and perhaps he works for them) as his
firm stated purpose of existing is alleged to attack anything Theist and
Deist sole for the label alone perhaps he is a anti-religious nut, or
stalking anti-religious nutz to infiltrate them in any case he deserves our
pity.
EVEN RIGHTEOUS LUNATICS LIKE YOU CAN CLAIM TO BELIEVE THAT DOESN'T MEAN THEY
ARE CORRECT, NOR SAVED!
~A~
TEMPLE OF REASON (Deist)
P.O.Box 1615
Altoona, Pa 16603
http://zito.biz http://templeofreason.org https://www.zito.biz/ssl
http://uk.geocities.com/andrew_zito
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/temple_of_reason
universally copyrighted 2005 Temple of Reason